Today, not only in scientific, but also in colloquial speech, one can often hear the word "hypothetically". What is hidden in this lexeme?
The semantics of a word is related to a noun"Hypothesis", which in translation from the ancient Greek language means "assumption". The term belongs to the world of science. This is a scientific conjecture, an assumption that has not yet been proven and tested. As a result of the experiment, the hypothesis can be proved and go into the category of facts or be refuted. The derivative of this word adjective "hypothetical" means "based on a hypothesis". The meaning of the word "hypothetically" is presumably acceptable.
Let's take a look at what facts were once possibleconsidered hypothetically. What is the universe in terms of cosmology? It is immutable, eternal. To prove this hypothesis, Einstein needed to introduce a cosmological constant value into the theory of relativity. In time, astronomers confirmed the conjecture of a brilliant scientist.
The proof of Fermat's famous theorem appearedOnly in 1994, mathematicians searched for it for three centuries. Prior to 2002, Poincare's assumption that any three-dimensional object with the properties of a sphere must be up to deformation by a sphere could be said to be a hypothetical question, but the Russian mathematician Grigory Perelman proved this assumption, and it passed from the category of guesses to the category of indisputable facts. Some of the problems that exist in science are still waiting for confirmation. The statements contained in them are still considered hypothetically.
This explanation of the emergence of all life onthe earth by divine will. In general, the question of the appearance of life for millennia disturbs the minds of scientists from different fields of knowledge. It is important for a person to respond to him, because his views, principles, and beliefs depend on this. Supporters of scientific creationism (creatio means "creation") are trying to find a scientific basis for their theory. In addition to this version of the birth of the world, there are several more hypotheses. And if the assumption of the spontaneous emergence of life looks frankly weak, then the judgment about the biochemical evolution of carbon compounds, expressed by Academician Oparin at the beginning of the last century, now divides part of the scientific world.