Valery Yakovlevich Bryusov, an extraordinary man, encyclopedically educated, stood at the origins of symbolism.
In his youth, he received a brilliant historicaleducation, he did not think himself without composing poetry. He positioned himself no more and no less than a genius. He really did a lot to loosen the art field that was stiff after Nekrasov, he created new forms of versification.
From Asia to Europe came the invasion of wild nomadictribes - the Huns. The name of their leader, Attila, aroused fear and horror, because the savages destroyed everything in their path. In 451, on the Catalan fields in Gaul, side by side the eternal enemies - the Roman centurions and the Germans - stood to stop the destruction of their culture and protect their lives. A bloody battle took place, and the Huns retreated. In history, their name has become a household name. These are barbarians, for whom there are no values that are only capable of destruction.
As once he himself changed the traditional poeticform to symbolism, so now Bryusov suggests the barbarians to collapse at all, crush. It's forgotten in the wine, intoxicated crowd. What for? And we must shake the decrepit world that has become stagnant in everyday life, refresh it.
He offers the slaves to destroy the palaces, and in the place of the throne halls to sow the field. Then, as a sequel, you should burn books and joyfully dance around the fires.
People should not fight against them. We must hide at the turn of change, together with our cultural achievements. Will there be anything cherished under a flying storm? It's an Affair case that plays, creating chaos, and nothing more. That's the way to act when the coming Huns come. Bryusov (the analysis gives such a conclusion), he will say that he welcomes everyone. Let everyone be destroyed, but he is ready to accept everything and forgive everything. The poem is extremely exalted and filled with pathetic. This is emphasized by verbs in the imperative mood. Behind them is fear and misunderstanding what the seas of blood will mean when a brother goes to his brother. What is really ugly is death, death and destruction. Welcome hymns are inappropriate here. Valery Bryusov did not understand this. "The coming Huns" - an analysis of the poem leads to rather gloomy conclusions, in the light of what we know today: civil war, the re-enslavement of the peasantry to collective farms, mass repression and executions. This is a terrible part of our history. And while in 1905 the poet sings the offensive of the new world, and this is the coming Huns (Bryusov, the analysis says he will not see the terrible consequences of the 17th year.)
Brilliantly erudite poet-experimenterdid not begin to use the usual poetic forms. He chose from his piggy bank something exotic - a three-impact dolnik. In the schematic entry, the first stanza looks like this:
U_ _U _ _U _
_U _ _U _ _U _
U_ _U_ _U_
_ _U_ _U _ _U_
This ends the analysis of the verse "The Coming Huns". Bryusov used metaphors, epithets, definitions, but they are characterized in the text.
If a homework assignment is given, then you can make such a title: "The Coming Huns" (Bryusov) analysis according to the plan:
Carefully read aloud the poem and analyze the stanzas.
</ p>