"Voice", season 4: reviews of the jury. The new jury of the show "Golos", season 4: reviews

The "Voice" show is a new hit on the domestictelevision. Unlike all other musical programs of the current and past seasons, the show firmly and confidently holds the lead in the race for the attention of the audience. What is the reason for the public interest? And what can we expect from the jury of the new season?

A little bit about the history

"Voice" is a Russian TV version of the popular show in Europe The voice, the rights to which were successfully sold to more than fifty countries.

Nevertheless, the domestic version turned outa bit different: viewers noted that our jury, even in a "blind" contest, is trying to guess the vocalist's appearance, that's why the vocal talent is not the most impartial assessment. But differences from the original format are inevitable: we have another variety, other musicians, other mentors and another opinion about the "right" artist.

TV show format

There was a lot on domestic televisionmusical programs in the "search for talent" format. At one time, for example, the "Star Factory" was popular. But time passes, everything changes. The audience, its tastes and requests are changing, and this is also a factor that needs to be adjusted. TV viewers became uninteresting to watch the same young artists singing to the soundtrack. So, it took a show, where the emphasis will be made entirely on the other. This explains the popularity of the project "Voice" in our country - there are completely different participants and live vocals.

Rules and Jury

As in the original TV show, the main criterionevaluation of the contestants is the voice. It is the lively and strong vocals that enable the jury to evaluate the artist and choose the best for the passage to the next stage. Each mentor is a recognized master of the domestic music scene. His task is to select participants to his team, relying only on hearing. After the stage of "blind auditions", the format of the transfer goes into the struggle "for the flight" between the contestants. And it is from the mentors that the entertainment of performances and the correct choice of numbers, which is necessary for revealing the potential of each of the selected artists, depends. The jury carefully selects the repertoire for all of its players, transferring the musical experience during the rehearsals.

On the show, there is no purpose to blind the artists with a newstar, the essence of the project - in the team work of the mentor and the ward, the result of which are sometimes completely unexpected and unofficial numbers. At the casting of "Voices" come mostly the already formed, albeit unknown, artists. Therefore, for them the jury is very important.

Mentors of previous seasons

The jury team of the show "Golos" underwent a change. Initially, the candidates experienced both criticism and approval. The judging panel of the first three seasons included Alexander Gradsky, Leonid Agutin, Dima Bilan and singer Pelageya. It turned out quite a "live" team.

The format of the TV show defined a clear divisionmentors on musical genres. Thus, the participants who impressed the jury had the right to choose the teacher who most impressed them. All four mentors quickly won the love of viewers with their impartiality, professionalism and sincere desire to discover new talents. The audience eagerly awaited new releases and worried about the contestants they liked. The show confidently took the leading position in the rating of the TV network grid, and the number of those who wanted to participate in the sensational project grew exponentially.

Transfer of experience of masters

The show "Voice" immediately distinguished itself by its atmosphere. Against the background of other vocal programs, he was singled out precisely by the attitude of the jury members to his wards. Participation in each room, genuine feelings, respect for the participants - these qualities are appreciated by the audience and in the mentors. The "Voice" did not become another "show-off", instead of it there was a professional and adult show. Candidates for the jury of the project were selected no less carefully than the participants. The preference was given not to the popularity and promotion of the artist, but to real talent, authority and merit in the musical field. Therefore, the professionalism of previous mentors was not to be doubted. All of them could be liked or disliked by the audience, but in one opinion the audience always converged - each of them went a long way, has a rich experience, can teach a lot to the contestants. And the peculiar division of the jury members into musical genres is the confirmation: the project brought together real masters of the Russian stage, fully realized in their field. But that was before.

Intrigue of the fourth season

After the completion of the third "Voice", viewers withLooking forward to the new season. And many asked a difficult question: will the past mentors remain? It would seem that the jury of the project has already fully formed and is not subject to change, but there have been rumors of changes. The viewers began to wonder who would be replaced, and, most importantly, by whom, and then the leadership of the First Channel officially announced the change in the composition of the jury of the popular project, but they refused to disclose the names of the new heroes. The reasons for such measures were called very different, but the result remained unchanged: in the new season viewers did not see the beloved Dima Bilan, Pelagia and Leonid Agutin.

The new jury. "Voice", season 4

The names of the mentors were kept secret untilthe latter, even polls were offered with options for candidates. There were whole discussions about who is worthy to take vacant seats on the rating TV show. Eventually, the season began with a premiere showing and the presentation of an updated jury. To the delight of the audience and the contestants, Alexander Boris Gradsky did not go anywhere. The rest of the staff underwent fundamental changes: the previous masters were replaced by Polina Gagarina, Grigory Leps and Vasily Vakulenko, better known under the pseudonym Basta.

The new teachers did not cause much surprise,many assumed such an outcome. But the questions about whether the members of the jury of the new season were fair were crept in. Is the referral chair connected with something other than professionalism? Why exactly Pauline Gagarin and right now? And does the format of the transfer of Grigory Leps fit into the format?

A negative reaction is also a reaction

The new jury of the show "The Voice" ... The 4 season of the project began precisely with this. And if initially the viewers took the news positively, then with each new release a wave of indignation and misunderstanding is growing. On the one hand, the candidatures of all three are very clear, moreover, Grigory Leps and Polina Gagarina already had similar experience in the programs "The Main Stage" and "I Want to Meladze". On the other - is the choice successful?

One can understand the violent reaction of the audience to the juryshow "Voice" - season 4, many were waiting for in many ways thanks to a well-coordinated team of the leader and mentors, to watch which was no less interesting than for the contestants. But the new season could not justify the hopes of the viewers, the project team in social networks flooded the listeners' negative comments about the jury of season 4. The "voice", however, still remains in the grid of Friday's broadcast, but for how long?

"Voice", season 4. Reviews of the jury

At one time, the exploded ratings project Firstchannel is now rapidly losing ground. What is the reason for this? Is the show format outlived itself? Or does the new jury make itself felt? "Voice", season 4, especially, always uniquely combined the opinions of the audience. But if initially the audience paid more attention to the participants, in new releases the barrage of indignation fell upon the mentors themselves and the creators of the TV show.

After the launch of new issues, more and morejury. "Voice" (season 4) has become one of the most discussed. There were many posts, polls and negative comments. Viewers actively express their opinion about the new jury of the project "Golos": the 4th season has become the most discussed in the history of domestic adaptation, but for some reason in a negative light.

If you recall the first programs, then criticismAlexander Borisovich Gradsky was subjected to a lot of things - many people disagreed with his statements and assessments. Now it's the other way around: it was the master who deserved most of the audience's approval, in contrast to Polina Gagarina and Grigory Leps. It is their viewers who are singled out in their comments. The overall picture of the reviews on the jury - "Voice", season 4, was a failure. Of all the new mentors only rapper Bastafalls out of the stream of general criticism, he was taken rather restrained, noting the inherent reasonable severity and discretion, and it was Vasily Vakulenko who called the most questions before the season began. As for Polina Gagarina, the listeners were unanimous: this artist does not hold out until the title of mentor.

Her reproach in insincerity, the desire to copyPelagia, in the crooked and biased. Yes, undoubtedly, Polina Gagarina is a talented singer who is now at the peak of her career and at the zenith of glory, but "Voice" is not the project she needs. Grigori Leps also caused a huge public response, receiving more than unflattering estimates.Many noted his unwillingness to delve into the essence of what is happening, rudeness and incompetence. Thus, we can conclude that the new composition of the jury "Golos" (season 4), reviews were not the best.

Change of mentors = change of format?

Rapid rating loss after the start of a newseason - a bad omen. It is likely that the leadership of the First Channel will come to the same opinion, and we are again waiting for change. Perhaps, they will again be replaced by mentors, and maybe they will just close the project for non-profitability. One thing is for sure: in the show "Golos" (season 4) reviews about the jury played an important role in reducing the interest of the audience. The project, as it began in 2012, has undergone significant changes. And it's not just the new faces of the jury. The participants were also much weaker than the previous ones.

In the first seasons we saw non-professionals withstrong and sometimes unique vocals. Now the project has turned into the next place of PR. Otherwise, how to explain the arrival of the ex-participant of "House 2" and the leading program "Eagle and tails", which were favorably received by the jury? "Voice" (season 4) - is definitely not the show that was before. Beginning as something fundamentally new, it gradually turns into a conveyor, similar to the "Star Factory", not properly following the quality of the produced "products". Is it to blame for this new jury of the show "Golos" (season 4)? Feedback tends to a positive response. Maybe it's just that the project adapts to the needs of modern TV and variety, changing its original principles?

The future of the renewed show

Undoubtedly, the new season is still popularprogram will not go anywhere from the grid of Friday broadcasting. We will be able to fully examine the struggle of the remaining participants for the coveted victory. But what will happen next? Will the show "Golos" (season 4), whose jury reviews were so sharp and negative, the last in their history, or will we see this team in new releases? The question remains open, especially since there is as yet no worthy alternative to such a changed format. This means that no matter how much this topic is being discussed, now the leadership of Channel One does not intend to change the composition of the jury in any way.

"Voice", season 4 (reviews of viewers here are unlikelyDo something) - the show is ambiguous. Although, who knows, maybe the indignation of the audience will subside, and the listeners will get used to the light-hearted Polina Gagarina, and the biased Grigory Leps, and to the unformatted Basta, as, for example, once used to Alexander Borisovich. And then, quite possibly, for the new jury "Golos" (season 4), the reviews will also receive positive ones.

For now, it's just worth watching the project forthe most important - his contestants, who are already approaching the final fights. Whatever the format of the TV show became, the goal remains the same: to find a strong and professional voice. So the overall picture remains the same, on the stage of the main musical project of the country again sound famous, beautiful and complex compositions performed to the accompaniment of a live orchestra. After all, this is the essence of the show "The Voice" (season 4). Comments on the jury, opinions on changing mentors and discussion of refereeing - all this again. It remains only to try to enjoy the talent of the contestants, not paying attention to secondary issues.

Conclusion

Who knows, maybe this is temporary, and in the new seasonthe management of the "Voice", listening to the reviews, will make their spectators happy with new maestros in the judges' seats, which will be more to the liking of listeners. Although no matter how professional the mentors of the popular show, there are hardly any candidates who endorse absolutely the entire audience. This means that even the most adequate and objective future of the jury can be in the same unattractive light as the current one, because the reaction of the public is always unpredictable.

</ p>