The verbs were, were. The use of the was was, were
English is a must in our dayfor studying, because without knowledge it is unlikely to expect to receive a highly paid, interesting and very promising work. Moreover, it is with the help of English that you can freely express yourself in any country of the world. Many, having started to study this foreign language, do not finish things to the end because of the difficulties arising on the way to such a cherished goal.
Learning English is not easy, becausehere there are a lot of nuances. Now we will talk about how to properly use the verbs was - were, and find out what they are all the same from each other are different.
The verbs was - were - the past form of "to be"
Before you start talking about usingabove verbs in English, it is recommended to find out what they are and where they originate from. The verbs were - were formed from one wrong verb, which is "to be", and they are its past form. The very verb to be in our native language is translated as "to be," "to happen," to "exist." Thanks to the proprietary phrase of William Shakespeare "To be or not to be", this wrong English verb is known even to those who are just about to start learning a foreign language.
As it was said above, to be is wrongverb, therefore its past forms are not formed by adding the ending "ed" in the second form (Past Simple), as well as the auxiliary verb had / have and all the same endings of "ed" in the third form (Past Participle). Wrong verbs are so called, because there is no definite rule by which they form. Their past forms must be simply learned, which is not so difficult as it might initially seem.
What was different from were?
Now it's time to talk about why all the sameThe wrong verb to be in the past form, which is Past Simple, has at once two variants and than they, actually, differ. The verb was translated into Russian as "was", "happened", "existed", while we were interpreted as "existed", "were" or "happened". It can be seen from the translation that these verbs differ primarily in number. The verb was in English should be used with a singular noun, while used together with a noun in the plural.
The verbs was and were in the Past Simple
Consider now the use of the was was -were in English. The first case when these verbs should be used is when constructing sentences in Past Past. This is the most understandable and common case, which should not be talked about much. Sentences with the verb was or were will now be considered. For example, "I was at home last evening" translates as "I was home last night," and "They were at the college yesterday" should be translated as "Yesterday they were in college."
There was / There were constructions
In English there are stable turnsThere are / There are, which in fact have no specific translation, but they are often used in sentences such as "There are seven pupils in the classroom", which should be interpreted as "There are seven students in the classroom". Consequently, the past form of such turns is There was / There were. The sentence "There were seven pupils in the classroom" should already be translated as "There were seven students in the classroom". It should be noted that in this case the use of the above-mentioned construction depends primarily on the number of subject.
The verbs were and were in Past Continuous Tense (past a long time)
In English there is another interestingthe construction going to, which translates as "going to do something". In the past tense, it has become was going to / were going to. As an example, consider two sentences. The translation of the sentence "I am going to swim" will look like "I'm going to swim", while "I was going to swim yesterday" should be interpreted as "Yesterday I was going to swim." As in previous cases, the use of the verbs referred to in this article depends entirely on the number of subjects.
The verbs were and were in Conditional Sentences (conditional sentences)
By and large, in this article we alreadyconsidered the main cases in which the verbs was-were to be used, but if you want to study more deeply the study of such a beautiful English language, you should know something else.
In English there are also specialconstruction of conditional sentences. To make it more clear, consider an example. The sentence "If I were you, I would buy this T-shirt" in Russian can be translated as: "If I were you, I would buy this T-shirt". It should be said that such conditional sentences in most cases begin with an if statement, translated as "if." For more detailed information about this design, read the section on English grammar "Conditional Sentences".
Quite often in such cases, to be advocatesAs an auxiliary verb for the formation of more complex times. In turn, the verbs were and was also auxiliary, and they should be used depending on the number of subject. However, in the head one always needs to keep the If I construction, which occurs in conditional sentences in the present tense and requires the presence of the presence of the verb were after the pronoun I. Only in no case should it be confused with some similar constructions that are not conditional and contain the phrase I was. For example, "Sorry if I was late for this lesson", which translates to "I'm sorry if I'm late for this lesson."
As you can see, master these subtle nuances of Englishlanguage is not so difficult as it seems initially. The use of was or was was limited to just a few simple rules that you just need to remember. The main thing is to understand when the desired form of the verb to be used in the past tense.
Believe me, in the future knowledge of Englishby all means you will be useful. And if you do not work abroad or you can not get a highly paid and prestigious job on the territory of your country, you will still have to communicate freely in English while on vacation in an exotic and sunny country. Learn English, improve, and you will certainly succeed.
</ p>
