SITE SEARCH

How to prove a guy his love ... question or instruction?

Someone, when reading the heading, it seems thatthe question is addressed to the girl, well, I've read it "like a man", maybe that's why someone will be disappointed not having received precise and exhaustive instructions, what the girl should do to prove her love to the guy. I read it that way, and therefore I apologize to those whose everyday curiosity, scientific thirst or the needs of professional growth have remained unsatisfied. Accept this irony as a tribute to the question that we will try to comprehend.

Or is there another option ... read it all: both boys and girls, because what is the difference in the methods of proving your love to someone, you will agree ... The question is not at all addressing.

Starting this article, I thought it was a question forsomeone relevant or just something narrative-rhetorical, which is used only to indicate the topic of conversation - how to prove love ... Or maybe someone wants to get a step by step instruction ...

So we are arranged, that sometimes the most important forWe try to hide ourselves questions for nothing meaningful and not attracting attention slogans and hackneyed clichés. Why is this happening? I do not think that anyone will be able to answer this question, and it's not just a lack of mind or life experience. In my opinion, the problem is in the problem itself, it belongs to the category of those who, by the very fact of their statement or formulation, inevitably generate even more questions. So, how to prove your love to the guy ... Does something in this phrase resemble something rational, such that to apply something to such an intimate phenomenon as love is somehow awkward?

Every day hundreds of people pass before my eyes,sometimes thousands of young people - students, completely different in their concerns, thoughts, experiences and general attitudes. I see them in lectures, where their views are lost in mass, at seminars where I see everything and understand about their relationship to each other, I see them kissing sitting on the windowsills and at the tables of the student café. I see and understand what a lot of relationships, called love, are present in these people. And are they all, at some stage of the relationship, concerned only about proving their love or are looking for ways to prove this? I admit that you can repeatedly and zealously try to prove mathematical theorems, you can prove something in court ... but then how do you apply this expression to the place at all?

There is another question, but how much time is neededprove? One of the greats said that this should last a lifetime, perhaps, but then the question itself loses its meaning, because the proof of love becomes the meaning of life. And here something is asking for something reminiscent of the answer: to find proof of love, you just have to live for this person, whom you need to prove it.

For example, to know how to prove your boyfriendlove, he needs, first of all, to take care of himself. It may sound paradoxical, but this is not a simple proposition, it is a well-formed belief. Why do I say this? And because I thought about what should break or overcome this proof? Mark Antony and Caesar, proving their love for Cleopatra, sent thousands of people for years to perish in the long wars between Rome and Egypt, the crafty and mercenary hunchback Talleyrand proved his love by "moving" the borders of entire states in Napoleonic Europe, without forgetting to replenish his own moss , and many more there are examples of such here "evidence". What must be done, how to prove to the guy his love, to the modern, young guy who has not yet reached the glory of Caesar and the wealth of Talleyrand? I think, first of all, do not even think about it at all. You just need to love - with words, you have to regret - sincerely, you have to serve - without self-abasement and servility, and then you will understand, then - believe, then - prove it!

I look at my students - and I'm sure theyin different ways, but they know how to prove and love, and it is better for those who do not prove this as a notorious theorem. Their eyes, joyful looks and smiles, kisses on the move, some utterly elusive gestures of attention tell us this.

In general, to answer this question (if it isquestion), it is better to formulate it from the opposite, then you can get a more accurate and quite practical answer to the question of how to prove your love to a guy. When you find out what you need to be to be hated, turned into an outcast, into an idol of evil and vice, then you will find the answer to the problem made in the headline.

Love without proving ... and unprovable love for all of you!

</ p>
  • Rating: