The ideal leader: what it should be, the qualities and features

The ideal leader in nature does not exist inprinciple. One good person, an experienced professional who is well versed in his business, may not even know how to structure the work so that the efficiency is maximum. Another head, excellent for most points, is not able to listen to criticism from employees, and therefore simply is not able to look at the problem from different angles. And such examples can be given an infinite number. Nevertheless, this does not mean that one should not strive for the ideal. Consider the most popular features and qualities of an ideal leader.

Adequacy

This is the first and most important point. The chief in the first place must adequately look at the surrounding world, the subordinates and the particular task facing him. A person may not understand the question, he may not be able to manage people, but if he is adequate, all the necessary skills will come very quickly. Although this is not an ideal leader, he will eventually learn and approach this proud title much closer than a completely inadequate boss.

Examples of complete inconsistency with one's positionin modern society can be found very much. Usually it's not a day of working children of influential parents and other such personalities, who are accustomed to receive everything and at once simply because they were born successfully. Such can destroy any project in the shortest possible time.

Professionalism and experience

The second important indicator of what should bean ideal leader, this is his experience, professionalism and skills. The chief, who previously worked in the same sphere in which his enterprise now exists, is able to make only the right decisions and accurately represent the scope and direction of the required work. This all allows you to very quickly achieve an excellent result and get high performance of the organization.

Insight

The ideal leader should be able to look atthe very essence of things, processes, people and problems. Many people with perceptiveness take the right decisions instinctively, not realizing why they did it that way. Unfortunately, this skill is usually innate, but it can also be developed, it is sufficient to be able to compare different elements in a single chain and make long-term forecasts based on not the most obvious data. The shrewd boss will be able to choose the best employees, even if their resume is not visible. He will be able to foresee possible problems and solve them in advance, and he will see the best option for further development, even in a situation where everyone else claims the opposite.

Criticism

In the book "The Ideal Leader" by Yitzhak Adizesit is said that when two people converge in everything, then one of them is not needed. This is absolutely correct remark. A normal boss should not simply take aggression without criticism of his own decisions, but also be able to hear all opponents. In the dispute, truth is born, as Socrates said, and most importantly, the dispute helps to hear another point of view that is priceless for making the right decision.

Discipline and responsibility

The ideal leader should be responsibleand disciplined, if only in order to set an example for one's own subordinates. It is difficult to get employees to follow the corporate style, if the boss himself regularly violates it. It is almost impossible to force to come to work on time or leave it strictly after the end of the working day, if the most important person in the enterprise allows himself to be regularly late for several hours or leaves immediately after lunch. Of course, there are always valid reasons such as an important meeting, negotiations with prospective clients and similar situations, but rarely when it all happens every day.

Complex solutions

The ideal leader is simply obliged to be ablemake difficult decisions. And even in such situations, when there is definitely no right answer and you need to do something at least. As stated in the book of the same Adizes, in most cases, inaction leads to a much more dire consequences than the wrong action. Any rule there are exceptions, and we can say that there are times when it's better just to wait, but the wait in this case also can be regarded as an action. And that's a real officer should always be ready not only to take decisions but also take responsibility for them, not shifting it on the heads of his subordinates, just carry out orders.

Cadres decide everything

The chief should be able to pick up employees so,so that they can perform all the functions and fully realize the potential of the company. If the manager starts doing something other than general management, signing documents, negotiating with major customers and making crucial decisions for the organization, then one or more employees are picked up incorrectly. In the most ideal situation, the bosses need only in force majeure situations. And this is true in both directions.

If people work and carry out their taskswell, even if they do not do it quite the way the boss would do, do not touch them. Ultimately, with the accumulation of experience, the optimal solution and the most effective solution to the problem will be found independently. And when you try to force a subordinate to do something wrong, as he understands it, you can simply start up a more or less well-functioning mechanism for working under a slope, and instead of higher indicators get a completely opposite result.

Conclusion

Summarizing, we can say that the idealthe manager must simultaneously meet too many criteria. Such people, if they are, then their number is very small, and all firms, organizations and enterprises can not be assaulted. So a conditionally good boss will be one who answers at least half of the indicators, including here first of all adequacy, without this important criterion, even the most excellent leader is unlikely to be able to effectively develop the organization and achieve good results.