Vaccinations for newborns: "for" and "against", do or not do?

Vaccination for newborns, "for" and "against" - is thatwe will discuss in this article. The topic is complex, not so much because many of us are inaccessible to medical terms, but because the life of our babies is at stake. In terminology, we'll sort it out somehow, but behind a pile of media information, political propaganda and in some cases a sincere lie how to discern the truth? The purpose after all is fine - do not do much harm!

Such an active opposition to vaccination inour country appeared only in the 90's, with the advent of glasnost and the opening of the "curtain". Our residents have access to information, about side effects, about the fact that vaccinations are not made in many countries to newborns. "For" and "against" began to speak out many scientists. Disputes began to boil serious, and simple people, parents, on whose shoulders responsibility for carrying out the vaccination, should understand this.

Surprisingly, children are vaccinated in compulsoryaccording to state plans, but the responsibility for side effects lies solely with those who do not understand this. We must sign a leaflet with consent before each injection. Perhaps, it is this state of affairs that leads parents astray. Aesculapius are not responsible for what they do ???

Based on the available information, only in Russian maternity hospitals vaccinations are made to the newborn. Pros and cons are not discussed in principle. It is believed that this procedure is extremely necessary.

The thing is that most of the country, no matter howit is regrettable to say this, living behind the "edge". The conditions in which the baby will be carried are unknown to the physicians. Well, if it's a comfortable apartment with all the amenities, and if not? The chance of having a tubinfected relative is too great. It is these children and the injection of BCG is calculated. About those who will live in normal conditions with adequate parents, just do not think. And it turns out that the good for some, plays a cruel joke with others.

As a result, some parents began to refusefrom carrying out of vaccination. In principle, the decision is literate, only on the condition that in the future, when the child gets a little stronger, the first vaccinations to the newborn will be carried out. How and when to do it is up to the parents and the pediatrician.

There are facts that all vaccinations to newborns ("for"and "against" which we are discussing) conducted not before the age of one year, but only after three years of life, can reduce the level of child mortality at times. For example, after this decision, Japan moved to the penultimate place (in terms of the number of child deaths) from the seventeenth. Earlier, by the way, all the Japanese babies BCG were also done in the maternity home.

Vaccinations for newborns (expert reviews areconfirm) should be done solely on an individual vaccination chart. A program that is uniform for all can not act. It is necessary not to go on about producers and anti-vaccines, but to make amendments to the development of medicine and science in general. Despite the fact that side effects from vaccines exist, their role is important, and it is proven. For example, just a century ago children died from poliomyelitis. With the onset of vaccination, mortality, as well as injuries, decreased at times. Many in our time do not even know what poliomyelitis is!

</ p>